EPIC Faith
In “The Gospel According to Starbucks” by Leonard Sweet the often lyrical Sweet suggests a vibrant Christian life is EPIC.
Experiental, Participartory, Image-rich and Connective
I can’t really think of four terms that better describe the current scene in social networking and how new technology can lift the church. Take Spring Hill for example:
- The web, the use of video sermons and the many different multi-site settings all set an experience for those in worship and fellowship.
- Missions and community events build participation (not to mention the many weekly service opportunities).
- The logo of family embraced by a heart (at least that is what I see) builds an image that is lasting in conveying the heart of Spring Hill and Christ.
- And finally the very real connections with faith and each other built through all of the above.
But how can technology take it even further? Well, look at any popular community site from YouTube to MySpace. Say what you want, they define an experience. With community content they are clearly participatory. And check that friend list — connections are made every day across the technical frontier. And how do images make it onto MySpace? Often in the form of a PhotoBucket widget. Yes, see Photobucket — a site dedicated to images (literally).
Not convinced how this can all be used in the pursuit of EPIC faith…see GodSpace for hands-on Christian social-networking. (Simply check the YouTube video — user contributed no doubt — full of images and smack on the front page of a site dedicated to participation and connection in the faith space).
A couple of flat screens can project the images of Christian hope, simple lighting control can shape a mood in worship and here in this very blog you can add your comments and participate in the conversation of how today’s church reaches the Netster generation and beyond. Connecting your thoughts in comment through the blogoshpere and into ministry action.
Think about it…the youth in your congregation don’t pass notes anymore — texting is faster! They don’t read the web, they create it in community and images (24×7 tapestries of art, music, video — all on the nearest cell phone). Will Spring Hill go EPIC with the effective and powerful use of media and technology as it proclaims the Truth (capital T) of Christ? The church clearly has nothing to fear and everything to gain by extending community through “the network” that surrounds us. As the printing press made the Bible available to virtually all — today’s connected communities accelerate the church’s ability to communicate the message of Christ (or the message against the truth).
What are your ideas for engaging in an EPIC faith?
Everyone is called to ministry (by Bob Munson)
We hear the term “Calling” a lot in Evangelical churches.
> God’s call to the ministry
> God’s call to “full-time professional Christian service”
> God’s call to “bi-vocational wholistic mission service”
I think it has had a very negative effect on Christian ministry. Here are some problems:
A. It is a great excuse NOT to minister. “I would love to serve God in ministry… BUT… I haven’t been called.” It’s an excuse that cannot be analyzed or challenged.
B. It is highly subjective. The Bible talks about calling in very concrete terms at times (eg. Moses and the burning bush). But today, despite words like “God spoke to me and said…”, people generally say they are “called” if they feel a strong emotional pull to do something.
C. It is used to justify bad decisions. Someone is completely unsuited for a task but keeps trudging along because he believes to change profession is to reject God’s calling.
D. Calling tends to be confused with profession. Now we don’t just get called to serve. We are called to a “bivocational youth pastorate in a cross-cultural context”, or a “professional minister of music in New York”, or a “Barefooting, tent-making, ESL Missionary in Peru”.
E. Worst of all, it is used to divide and deny. Many seminaries will not train people who will not describe some mediocre set of experiences that they describe as their “calling”. Mission boards and pastoral search committees will reject people who can’t describe something akin to a “call”.
It is an unconscionable thing that a concept that is supposed to enhance one’s ministry has become a tool to keep people unused and ignorant.
Many people look to the calling of Paul as a guide for how we are to look at God’s calling. It was real… it could happen again, but it is no sense normative. Paul’s conversion and calling was so dramatic because he would have listened to God no other way. We should not seek to live in such opposition to God’s will that we could only respond by such drama. The vast majority of passages in the New Testament on “calling” refers to the call to salvation, open to all. The few verses that do indeed refer to a call to ministry, have had a lot of strange theological baggage tied to them. So…
-I don’t see calling as (necessarily being) miraculous.
-I don’t see calling as a unique aspect of the clergy.
-I don’t see calling as a test of service.
I see calling as a path, and a relationship. When Jesus spoke to Peter, Andrew, and others on the Sea of Galilee, he did not say, “I am calling you to a job as a professional apostle.” Rather, he said “Follow me and I will make you fishers of men.” It is like Jesus was saying,
“Be with me. If I go here, you go here. If I go there, you go there.
Wherever you are will be home because that is where I am. Do what I am doing, where I am
doing it, and it is enough.”
-
Archives
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (5)
- August 2007 (1)
- July 2007 (6)
- May 2007 (1)
- April 2007 (5)
- March 2007 (4)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS